Genuine question. I feel like there’s too much division and that people should find common ground. I really don’t like the two-party system in the US either.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 小时前

    I don’t know how the hell we’re going to eliminate our first past the post voting system. The two entrenched parties, by design, will want to hold onto that power, and it will require their cooperation to both make change while simultaneously making the active choice to let go of power.

    Doesn’t seem likely to happen, which is depressing.

    BTW, I’m not disagreeing with you, just felt my reply made the most sense here.

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 小时前

      New Zealand switched from first past the post to mixed-member proportional in 1992. Despite a two party system at the time.

      • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 小时前

        No they won’t. As long as fptp exists, and as long as one party that blindly aligns with fascism and votes no matter what (as we have seen in practice), then all we will see is continued consolidation of power to that one party and a continued erosion of our rights.

        We are living this exact scenario RIGHT NOW. One party was apathetic in voting, and the other one capitalized on it.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 小时前

      I dont know how they got rid of monarchs when they hoard all the power, but somehow they’re mostly gone (at least de facto, since “monarchs” in constitutional monarchies are not true monarchs)

      Maybe it goes a bit beyond just asking nicely. See Euromaiden Revolution (it was about corruption and foreign influence not fptp, but same principle applies)

      Edit: typo