Analysis and images of the parades is all over the internet and in the last megathread; for the China-India stuff I recommend this article, as well as the Tricontinental in general.

Image is from @xiaohongshu@hexbear.net’s comment in the last megathread.


Last week was the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2, and on such an occasion, China put on quite an impressive military parade, especially in comparison to the rather drab and corporate parade that the USA recently had. In attendance were many world leaders, including Putin, Kim Jong Un, and a very happy-looking Lukashenko.

This took place shortly after the SCO summit in Tianjin, in which Modi was notably in attendance. That one of the world’s most powerful fascists was in attendance in China near the anniversary of the World Antifascist War is obviously pretty ironic. Regardless, the mood was still relatively positive; for example, Xi announced the acceleration of the creation of the SCO development bank, and Indian-Chinese relations are once again in the thaw cycle of their long-term cyclical pattern, with direct flights resumed and links expanded. The fact that there is this much projected optimism from China about a Global South which is being increasingly tariffed, infiltrated, starved, looted, bombed, invaded, and massacred in the hundreds of thousands by rabid imperialist dogs is perhaps a little tone-deaf, but buoying up the SCO is better than doing nothing at all, I suppose.

Any astute Geopolitics Understander can tell you that this is certainly not India joining the side of the Global South, but instead a move somewhat forced upon them as they seek to balance both sides for their own gain. As Trump amps up pressure on India via tariffs, it is natural that India would seek leverage, and there is much that India gains: industrial development, increased intra-regional trade, and scientific knowledge from a China which has, in numerous fields, now pulled ahead of the USA. India is also facing numerous internal crises, ranging from run-of-the-mill capitalist incompetence and corruption, to worsening conditions for farmers, to the ravaging impacts of climate change, and increasing their links with China is a way to vent off a little of that pressure and protect Modi’s regime.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    https://archive.ph/mPBxH

    F-35 Lot 18 ‘price increase’ due to inflation, rising raw material cost: Pentagon

    The Pentagon says that inflation, an ever-rising cost of raw materials and supply chain woes are to blame for a “significant price increase” of Lot 18 F-35 fighter jets, including those currently under negotiation with the Swiss military.

    more

    Following a cost dispute with Switzerland that threatens to cut Bern’s planned buy of 36 F-35As, a defense official explained in a statement to Breaking Defense last month that “costs associated with the F-35 program, particularly for airframes and engines, have been trending higher than the initial estimates outlined in the F-35 Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA)” that Switzerland signed in 2022. The rising costs are “primarily attributed to inflation, significant global price increases for raw materials, and supply chain disruptions,” the official said. “Switzerland’s 2022 F-35 LOA faces a projected $610M price increase due to significant price increases in the Lot 18 production contract being finalized by the Joint Program Office (JPO),” they added.

    The official’s claim of rising prices for Lot 18 comes amid ongoing negotiations between the JPO and F-35 manufacturer Lockheed Martin, which was awarded an $11.8 billion undefinitized contract — meaning dollar amounts and quantities were not settled — in December to kickstart production as details were hammered out. It’s not clear whether rising prices were already baked into that contract, which was issued before a global trade war initiated by the Trump administration in April that threatens to drive up prices of critical materials. Lockheed referred questions about Lot 18 negotiations to the JPO and queries about Switzerland’s order to the Swiss and US governments. A JPO spokesperson said in a statement to Breaking Defense on Wednesday that the “cost per aircraft varies as a function of quantity, variant mix, and economic forces. “The global economy has experienced significant inflationary pressures since the Lot 15-17 contract was signed. Nevertheless, the F-35 Joint Program Office and Lockheed Martin arrived at a cost per air vehicle” — an estimate limited only to the airframe and excludes key components like the engine — “below the relevant inflation indices, underscoring the F-35 Enterprise’s commitment to control costs.” When adjusting for inflation, the spokesperson added that “the cost per air vehicle” in Lot 18 “is consistent with the cost of those in Lot 15-17,” and said that more detailed information “will be available once Lot 18-19 are definitized,” the spokesperson added. F-35 engine-maker Pratt & Whitney referred a request for comment about engine prices to the JPO.

    Swiss Cheese (As In Money)

    The Pentagon’s estimate of the $610 million price increase is notably lower than that offered by Swiss officials, who last month projected a range of 650 million to 1.3 billion Swiss francs (at the time, roughly $807 million to $1.6 billion). The Swiss armament procurement department, or armasuisse, explained to Breaking Defense that the numbers “align” after taking into account “domestic cost increases,” including taxes, exchange rates and “increased spending” on infrastructure at Swiss airbases. “We would also like to emphasize that the Swiss Government remains committed to the procurement of the F-35A. Armasuisse and its U.S. government counterparts are working closely to continue implementing this procurement,” the spokesperson added.

    another article arguing that the Swiss don’t necessarily have much of a choice other than “remaining committed”

    Overall, the Swiss government emphasized the deal should be fixed at 6 billion Swiss francs, or over $7.4 billion in current dollars. When Swiss officials announced the impasse over fixed pricing for their F-35 order, a press release from the Swiss government said that it was “not possible at the present time to calculate precisely the total cost of the procurement,” estimating that the final price “will depend on a range of factors such as inflation in the USA, the development of commodity prices on the global markets and other factors such as price increases due to the tariffs imposed by the USA worldwide.” Switzerland in particular has been reeling from the Trump tariffs after being slapped with a shocking 39 percent duty, leading some Swiss lawmakers to call for rejecting the F-35 buy. In August the US defense official said that “Switzerland requested a special note in its F-35 LOA to clarify that the aircraft will be procured using fixed-price contracts once the Foreign Military Sales case enters the procurement process.” However, the official said, “[f]ixed-price contracts account for inflation and provide cost predictability but do not guarantee that the estimated LOA price will match the final contract price, a distinction outlined in the LOA and accompanying messaging for transparency. Under U.S. law, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) purchasers must pay the actual costs incurred by the U.S. Government (USG) to acquire defense articles and services. “The U.S. Government recognizes the importance of maintaining trust and transparency in the Swiss F-35 procurement process, particularly given our longstanding productive bilateral relations with Switzerland,” the official continued. “The U.S. remains committed to working closely with Switzerland to address any concerns and to strengthening the bilateral defense relationship between our nations.”

    Switzerland’s first F-35 was originally expected to be handed over in 2027, with deliveries continuing until 2030. The December Lot 18 contract between Lockheed and the Pentagon specifically covered 145 airframes and was previously expected to be finalized in the spring, but Lockheed officials now predict the deal will be clinched in the second half of this year, Chief Financial Officer Evan Scott said during an earnings call in July. The JPO has since issued an over $2.8 billion undefinitized contract for 141 Lot 18 engines — four fewer than the number of airframes and a figure that Pratt said in a press release includes spares.

    The JPO is also expected to exercise an award for Lot 19 as part of a “combined” production deal around the time of finalizing the Lot 18 contract, though values and quantities for the subsequent lot have not been disclosed. (The JPO previously told Breaking Defense that Lot 18 is structured as a base year and 19 as an option, and that lawmakers’ passage of a full-year continuing resolution for FY25 furnished the funds necessary to award Lot 19.) The Trump administration’s fiscal 2026 budget notably slashed the Pentagon’s own F-35 buy, cutting the Air Force’s purchases essentially in half. Lawmakers have indicated support for restoring some of those aircraft, though an FY26 budget has not yet been finalized by Congress.