• staph@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This kind of stuff never happens overnight. It happens slowly, incrementally, and the people are never mad enough at too much sudden change to be motivated enough to do anything. People should feel good about the imposition of boundaries, and it helps that for the average user, the boundaries often result in a better user experience.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think you guys understand that forcing windows to only run approved by Microsoft software would literally break the world as we know it. Microsoft know this. There’s no way around it.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I was responding to this:

        Microsoft is smart enough not to piss off every giant corporation

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, and they can’t get rid of “sideloading” without literally killing their entire company because gigantic corporations, where they make the majority of their money, are the ones the most beholden to legacy software that would be blocked if they did. Banks, governments, hospitals, schools…….everything would not be able to function.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Well I think you’re moving the goalpoast a little here 😅, but believe me, they already do, lots of soft that doesn’t get around the windows defender.