• SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I do wonder if negative/extremely low energy prices is the point where we could/should spin up carbon capture technology.

    At the very least we could just have a giant laser beam shooting the free energy (which is essentially captured heat) into space.

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not really captured heat, though, since the incoming photons are (mostly) not infrared. Solar panels don’t cool off the surrounding area directly; they’re mostly converting visible light into electricity.

      Direct air capture is still really hard to do at scale for thermodynamic reasons. The quantity of CO2 in the air is very low (~420 parts per million), which makes it really challenging to extract. It’s much, much more efficient to use the energy we’re harvesting to just avoid emitting additional CO2 than to try to capture it, but that’s hard to monetize. Direct air capture is mostly a grift/pipe dream at this point.