recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 8 天前How a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1imageHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comrecursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 8 天前message-square26fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down16·edit-27 天前I could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary. Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
minus-squareVictor Villas@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 天前Only conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
minus-squareganryuu@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 天前So, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·7 天前I didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.
I could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary.
Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
lol
Only conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
You forgot your tin foil hat.
So, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
I didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.