• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.

    • Grok: writes embarrassing words.
    • Rockets: can weigh hundreds of metric tons, carry explosive chemicals, can crash into populated areas resulting in loss of life.

    In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Rockets: Unmanned

      Twitter: Manned

      The difference in importance seems correct to me

      • Rose@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they’re “manned”. However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called “current legislation” and “capitalism”, no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! …Isn’t this great?

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        reading comprehension: none

        Don’t know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Then it’s a good thing you’re not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?

            The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.

            Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you’re the real threat.

            Seems like you’re arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That’s not a valid argument against words, though.

            Again, total lack of perspective & sense.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                physics too hard: nonphysical things can’t kill? preposterous

                Basically. Pretending the harm of something physical going wrong (potential to cause real death) is at all comparable to the nonphysical going wrong (a jumble of angry words) is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. The distinction between physical & nonphysical is lost on these loonies.

  • Nicolas Perez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    That one time where Elon raised his hand in a familiar way… was a signal that lead us to this…

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, similar models and current builds without the “prompt” do not do this. This is just Muskrat forcing Nazism through a hidden prompt. Something like don’t be woke, it is okay to offend people, and freedom of speech is more important than hate speech.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just because it’s PRAISING HITLER and Calling for a NEW HOLOCAUST AGAINST JEWS does NOT, and I repeat does NOT, make Grok Anti Semetic! Grok would FIRST have to say STOP USING STARVING CHILDREN AS TARGET PRACTICE for it to be Deemed ANTI SEMETIC!

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    elon didn’t rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi…is anyone out there still going to defend elon?

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.