• tb_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I suppose that is so; but if you’d ask them whether they’d also rather have the ad revenue, I would assume most of them would say yes.

    Ah, yes. Make fun of me for signing up with some domain when I was still clueless about Lemmy. Thanks. Really appreciate the generalisation.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d expect most resent the shitty split

        That does not prove your point of them not getting any support, though.

          • tb_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Very cool. I love discrimination.

            I did want to say one more thing, though, but feel free to ignore.

            If you’d said something like “a one time donation supports a creator more than years of Premium ever would”, I would not have argued. But what you are saying is plainly false.

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              suck googles dick! For artists!

              I try to not use google products, and if i must, to give them as little data as possible. There is no way to pay for content anonymously; even if the payment is untraceable the account activity builds a profile.

              discrimination

              Lol

              • tb_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                suck googles dick! For artists!

                I’m not telling you to do that; I’m saying your initial statement is wrong.

                I wouldn’t have been on Lemmy if it wasn’t for moving away from big tech.
                But now it seems people take issue with that as well because I went with the basic bitch option when signing up, or did something horrific happen with .world whilst I was keeping away from social media in general?

                • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  .world uses the over centralization and defaultness to shield some pretty vile zionist and neoliberal positions they enforce. Past few days there very suddenly appeared a move asking for them and others to defederate next largest instance. Timing is suspicious, and a majority of the most obnoxious assholes are there anyway.

                  • tb_@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    That doesn’t sound great, might you have some further reading on that?