Read
Settlers: The Mythology Of The White Proletariat from Mayflower to Modern - J. Sakai
A uniquely important book in the canon of the North American revolutionary left and anticolonial movements, Settlers was first published in the 1980s. Written by activists with decades of experience organizing in grassroots anticapitalist struggles against white supremacy, the book established itself as an essential reference point for revolutionary nationalists and dissident currents within the Marxist-Leninist and anarchist movements. Always controversial within the establishment left, Settlers uncovers centuries of collaboration between capitalism and white workers and their organizations, as well as their neocolonial allies, showing how the United States was designed from the ground up as a parasitic and genocidal entity. As recounted in painful detail by J. Sakai, the United States has been built on the theft of Indigenous lands and of Afrikan labor, on the robbery of the northern third of Mexico, the colonization of Puerto Rico, and the expropriation of the Asian working class, with each of these crimes being accompanied by violence.
The counter-revolution of 1776: slave resistance and the origins of the United States of America - Gerald Horne
In this trailblazing book, Gerald Horne complements his earlier celebrated Negro Comrades of the Crown, by showing that in the prelude to 1776, the abolition of slavery seemed all but inevitable in London, delighting Africans as much as it outraged slaveholders, and sparking the colonial revolt. In the prelude to 1776, more and more Africans were joining the British military, and anti-slavery sentiments were deepening throughout Britain. And in the Caribbean, rebellious Africans were chasing Europeans to the mainland. Unlike their counterparts in London, the European colonists overwhelmingly associated enslaved Africans with subversion and hostility to the status quo. For European colonists, the major threat to security in North America was a foreign invasion combined with an insurrection of the enslaved. And as 1776 approached, London-imposed abolition throughout the colonies was a very real and threatening possibility–a possibility the founding fathers feared could bring the slave rebellions of Jamaica and Antigua to the thirteen colonies. To forestall it, they went to war. The so-called Revolutionary War, Horne writes, was in large part a counter-revolution, a conservative movement that the founding fathers fought in order to preserve their liberty to enslave others–and which today takes the form of a racialized conservatism and a persistent racism targeting the descendants of the enslaved. The Counter-Revolution of 1776 drives us to a radical new understanding of the traditional heroic creation myth of the United States.
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms https://hexbear.net/post/1403966
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube](https://live.hexbear.net/c/movies
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread https://hexbear.net/post/5423450
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread https://hexbear.net/post/5346484
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread https://hexbear.net/post/5423990
- 👊 New Weekly Improvement thread https://hexbear.net/post/5415025
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread https://hexbear.net/post/5419599
- ☕ Parenting Chat https://hexbear.net/post/5414669
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Been on Taimi for about a month and finally got two interactions back to back that give me the ick after nothing but positive experiences
CW: fatphobia, fetishism, transphobia
So the one that’s more bothersome to me was actually with another trans woman. She was fairly forward with what she wanted sexually, and I was okay with it so we exchanged some pictures. I send her some pictures of me fully naked and she just responds with “Wow I can tell you like to eat a lot”.she then goes in on me for not being perfectly shaved. Keep in mind that according to most metrics (which are bullshit, everybody’s healthy weight is different) I’m only 10 pounds overweight and I just shaved last week so my body hair wasn’t even out of control, just not perfect. Not that this behavior would have been okay if I were more overweight, or less well shaved, but Jesus Christ some people are ridiculous with their standards. Like my sister in Christ, you swiped on me, you knew I was a little bit chubby, why did you have to try to make me feel like shit over it?
Second one is one that I don’t even know how to feel about. So I have a thing for bigger girls. I’ve dated people of all body types, I don’t discriminate, but I find fat femmes really beautiful. Well I match with a fat femmes, and things go fine for a little bit, albeit more sexually charged than I’m used to. Oh well, she’s hot so I’m down. Well she starts going into more fetish territory, asking if I’d want to massage with her belly, see an ultrasound of her belly, ect. completely unprompted. Some of it is stuff I’d be down for, others just seem too dehumanizing to her for me to be interested in. You know what though, whatever gets you off, who am I to draw the line on how much someone can fetishize themselves. She then starts asking about more serious relationship questions with no transition, asking what I’d do if I got her pregnant, what I look for in a date, that kind of stuff. Keep in mind that we’re like an hour into a conversation at this point, she’s asking if I’d be with her forever if I got her pregnant. I give honest answers and say I’d want to get to know her more. She then asks if my “male instinct” would kick in if she was pregnant. I ask what the fuck she means by this and she just brushes it off. She is now back to sending me fetish-y texts all day, even though I haven’t responded since the “male instincts” thing.
Idk, the whole conversation felt like she was trying to fetishize herself to find someone to be with her with how she’d switch between the fetish stuff and relationship questions on a dime and that’s what really felt icky about it. It was like watching another trans woman purposefully appeal to chasers. Am I overreacting? Is this something that’s reasonable to be put off by or am I just being a kink shamer?,
CW: same as above?
The “male instinct” thing is weird and insensitive. Deal-breaker territory imo. Someone who is ignorant but caring would wait a while and ask with tact about something they are concerned about, likely after trying to educate themselves first and stressing that they might be totally off-base and just need some help to understand or be reassured. This person seems to be fairly cavalier with this comment/question to the effect that it is actually transphobic.