tintory@lemm.ee to Politics@beehaw.org · 2 years agoGavin Newsom Veto Strikers' Unemployment Bill (SB-799)www.stoppopulationdecline.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down10cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkGavin Newsom Veto Strikers' Unemployment Bill (SB-799)www.stoppopulationdecline.orgtintory@lemm.ee to Politics@beehaw.org · 2 years agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squarekhalic@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 years agoI’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…
minus-squarefuzzywolf23@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoThis is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.
minus-squaretintory@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoGuess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic
minus-squarefuzzywolf23@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoI mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don’t cite them as primary sources, ok?
minus-squaretintory@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoI will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn’t, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html) I know which one I be using
minus-squareprole@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoThe one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.
minus-squaretintory@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoOH NO, I have a bias I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources
I’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…
This is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.
Guess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic
I mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don’t cite them as primary sources, ok?
I will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff
Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn’t, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html)
I know which one I be using
The one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.
OH NO, I have a bias
I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources