• Newsteinleo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you assume 25% of player will buy at 80, 50% will buy at $50, and 25% will buy at $20. Per 100 buyers they stand to make $5,000. However if they start at $50 with 75% of buys buying at that price, they will make $4,250. This is about maximizing profit by selling to fans with deep pockets first then discounting latter to captured the rest of the player base.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      That tactic would work if it was a multiplayer game or a major franchise but with a single player cookie cutter game there’s no urgency for me to get started and no FOMO. It just isn’t that interesting of an IP

      • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        right, so that would put you into the 50% or the lower 25%, but there are people that will buy higher price, and as long as there is 1% willing to buy before the first sale it is worth it for them.

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        People still will, because lots of people spoil, some like watching streaming etc. When new stuff comes out and I’m not ready to start it, it often also involves stop visiting certain communities, discords, etc.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      But what they don’t take into account is that 75% all at once creates an excitement buzz around the game that ends up causing even more sales then would ever happen otherwise. Look at games like Pokémon go or PalWorld that generated so much buzz. I tried both of them because of the hype and I normally wouldn’t have bothered otherwise.

      • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        With a game like there has probably been existence market research to account for how much buzz the game will get. They may even be counting on the buzz to sell more copies at full price.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      So if we assume the world is a magical place where poor people don’t exist, it makes perfect sense.

      • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        That is exactly how people making these decisions think. Its all numbers to them, there are no people involved in their thinking.

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    i will continue to enjoy my indie games that cost me 5€, thanks.

    better yet my free games like warframe that have cost me nothing and given me thousands of hours of enjoyment.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seriously! I got a $50 steam gift card for Christmas, bought one full price dlc (Shadow of the Erdtree) and like five or so indie games that I’ve put way more time in!

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just as heads up, Obsidian, I’ll require this to be at least 75% off if it’s good and over 20 hours of single-player campaign. If it’s shorter, I can be enticed at 90% off. I’ll wait for a few years, no problem, my family group backlog is in the thousands.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Them: “we don’t set the price”.

      You: “I’ll buy it if you set a lower price”.

      So people don’t even read the headlines anymore?

      • zecg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, I’ve seen it, that is feedback and it should be invaluable to all interested parties, not only those who set the price.

    • Widdershins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only thing that stands out thinking about the game is the dialog choices you get when you play through the game with really low intelligence. I think it gets the best ending.

  • 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I really enjoyed the first game, not AAA new game price enjoyment though. I mean, I got as much fun out of it while playing as I have anything else, it just wasn’t as rich and deep as a fallout game. I give it a pass since it’s establishing a new universe but as much as I liked it, it’s most certainly a blue light special fallout clone.

    So, asking inflated AAA prices seems, somewhat short sighted. I’d absolutely pay what I did for the first game, 80 bucks is a hard no for me though. I might buy it when it’s cheaper, but by then I’ll likely have seen enough clips, read enough reviews and gotten busy enough to just forget about it.

    Bummer.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    But can we focus on optimizing games so thst it runs on the most potato of potato PCs ??

    I think that’ll work wonders along with the pricing

  • Gwingollor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Doesn’t matters the masses will complain online, bit still pay it.