Ok, so remote Federation scientists seem to suffer a lot in ST, but I wonder how much of that is survivor bias. I mean, we can assume redshirt casualty rates are fairly consistent across starships, although that could be a leadership issue; but what if there’s a vast population of remote research outposts and only a very tiny fraction ever gets in trouble? We just don’t know. The Federation is enormous, and covers a vast 3d volume - if there are outposts even slightly evenly distributed across the surface of that volume, we’d be looking at a large population. More researchers probably die from slipping on food spills than rogue revived eugenics war corpcicles.
Ok, so remote Federation scientists seem to suffer a lot in ST, but I wonder how much of that is survivor bias. I mean, we can assume redshirt casualty rates are fairly consistent across starships, although that could be a leadership issue; but what if there’s a vast population of remote research outposts and only a very tiny fraction ever gets in trouble? We just don’t know. The Federation is enormous, and covers a vast 3d volume - if there are outposts even slightly evenly distributed across the surface of that volume, we’d be looking at a large population. More researchers probably die from slipping on food spills than rogue revived eugenics war corpcicles.