• Wildfire0Straggler3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    Source? That seems incredibly unrealistic to disassemble an entire plane and put it back together every six months. Its far more likely it gets thoroughly inspected every 6 months.

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not the whole plane, just major systems. The main cost is the engines, that alone likely costs millions. As it mentioned, there’s other overhauls too, like the landing gear that’s due. These are all on a fixed schedule related to “this many flight-hours” and a certain number of years or months for some parts. The engine overhaul isn’t just “six to twelve months,” it’s “this many flying hours” (which typically comes out to 6-12 months all the same).

      I wouldn’t be upset about the overhauls, that’s a normal part of the cost of owning a plane (though it’s harder to sell if it’s due one, because the buyer will have to spend a fuckton of money before flying it).

      The upsetting part is that’s is foreign and not up to spec - AKA yeah they’ll have to remove, scan, x-ray and debug every part of that interior and redo the entire electrical and coms system, and install nuclear shielding on the whole-ass plane. Still cheaper than buying a new AF1 but not by as much as one would hope.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You might be right. I feel like I saw it on Lemmy a couple of days ago and just absorbed it uncritically, and I cannot find it any other place now.

    • deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      They speak so plainly about aircraft mechanics, I’d be willing to suspect they accidentally forgot to say it was the engines that were rebuilt