• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Is it more efficient to cycle the room temperature though? I’ve heard it’s better to get a room to temp and the machine can work less to maintain it. But maybe that’s old advice…

    • Markus29@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That is old advice. AC works pretty fast, especially in a small hotel room. If you have floor heating/cooling and a heat pump then it would make sense to leave it on all day.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think that advice is specific to the “underground heat exchanger” type of heat pump.

          • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s not; air source are also not particularly fast to make significant temperature changes compared with gas or electric heat when appropriately sized.

            It is more specific to radiant (water/steam/in-floor) solutions though, as that is very slow to adjust

        • Markus29@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes I know, I meant air/water heat pumps which heat/cool the mass of a building instead of the air. AC units are oversized more often than not and are not that efficient at modulating. I think it’s safe to say that it’s more efficient to turn it of when you leave for more than an hour or two