dwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square318fedilinkarrow-up1947arrow-down121
arrow-up1926arrow-down1external-linkPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comdwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square318fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day ago So do you target AI training explicitly? No. Same rules as everyone else. How can that he even enforced? Disclosure of training sources Is my review sentiment evaluation machine illegal now? If your sources are copyrighted, yes. What if I RAG copyrighted content in am I in jail now? Unlikely. None payment of restitution in a civil case could end in jail via contempt of court. How could this possible be ever enforced? The same way other copyright claims are enforced. This issue is dominated by tech illiterate Literacy in technology has no effect on the law. fall for copyright propaganda. We’re had many years of publishing strengthening their legal position. It’s case law, not propaganda.
No. Same rules as everyone else.
Disclosure of training sources
If your sources are copyrighted, yes.
Unlikely. None payment of restitution in a civil case could end in jail via contempt of court.
The same way other copyright claims are enforced.
Literacy in technology has no effect on the law.
We’re had many years of publishing strengthening their legal position. It’s case law, not propaganda.