• RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Idk, even before Musk went full meth head things were already heading south pretty fast - they’d completely squandered their first mover advantage and their “move fast and break things” approach was really starting to take a toll on their brand reputation. Teslas were already starting to be known as expensive cars with terrible build quality, then the constant delays and broken promises about self driving did them no favors either.

      A Tesla made sense when they were pretty much the only really viable luxury EV, but when you can get equivalent cars (with better build quality) from established Western manufacturers for ~75% the price or from a Chinese manufacturer for ~60%, what advantage do they have?

      Musk’s cult of personally is/was a big part of it, so they are kinda screwed either way - the stink of Musk won’t instantly vanish if they get rid of him, and taints everything while he stays

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Do you know the saying, the revolution devours all its children.

      The electric car revolution is over. Tesla is over.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    If and when that cunt leaves you people need to continue the Tesla boycott. The message should be that association with Elon is damaging long term to a company. And not that Elon will bring publicity and notoriety to your company which can be turned into sales and increased market shares long after he’s left. Because that’s how these idiots think. They’ll happily accept short term loss if they think the bounce back after he’s gone will net them even more.

    His brand is toxicity so don’t support any company that works with him. Ever. Treat him like a rapist. Actually maybe that’s a bad idea… if you treat him like a rapist the US will probably elect him their next president 💀🇺🇲.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been expecting this for a good while.

    Rule #1 Never believe his announcements. They may be true or not.

    Rule #2 Always assume that most people believe in him and his announcements.

    Rule #3 After applying the rules #1 and #2, sometimes you can see what he is trying to achieve with the announcement itself.

    Most times it is about inflating his ego. Often it is about pushing (manipulating) the stock market.

    So when he recently announced to "be allocating far more of my time to Tesla.” I immediately thought the hell you want to donate them your oh so precious time, again, suddenly (there would even be admitting a fault in it if he actually did), no you just want the stocks to stay up. And so I concluded that he doesn’t feel like taking responsibility at Tesla anymore.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      I agree. And there is also a situation like this, where even if the claim is truthful, It doesn’t actually change anything. He could shift from being the CEO to being the number one advisor to the company, and given his ownership, it would still be the same in effect.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How about a potato? On the minus side, it doesn’t do anything, but it has the advantage of not being an utter piece of shit that does nazi salutes.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Next weeks news: Tesla board members all die in tragic autodrive mishaps.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This should have happened awhile ago. Lots of good people work at Tesla and I’d like to be able to buy an American made electric without worrying about vandalism or worse. Yeah there are a couple of other options but this should be one too.

    • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, just because Elon won’t be CEO anymore doesn’t mean he won’t be getting funds from it to fund his bullshit. He’s still an owner of it…

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Spoiler, assholes own everything. Good luck finding products that don’t make people you hate richer. Yeah you can find small niche products like beard wax from a local guy, but a car? Please tell me about a great car company.

        • jonathan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          For me there’s a big difference between funding someone anonymous (to me) who might be an asshole vs someone known to me who definitely is. I can tolerate the former, but not the latter.

          • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It really is, knowingly supporting someone who is openly evil, is obviously worse than unknowingly supporting someone who is evil, but tries to hide it.

            We should not let people be openly evil, it just feels like a real stupid move.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        he’s a minority owner, don’t think he himself even holds a majority of voting shares outright–there’s some bullshit and shenanigans going on that gives him the ‘control’. iirc, it requires near-90% approval of all non-musk held voting shares to make ‘major’ changes like ousting a board member or ceo. that’s why he’s still ‘in charge’

        • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          it requires near-90% approval of all non-musk held voting shares to make ‘major’ changes like ousting a board member or ceo.

          No, you’re thinking of News Corp and Murdoch’s shenanigans.

          Tesla has a standard structure. He doesn’t own a majority of shares, but he does own a significatn percentage and investors aligned with him combined have enough for him not to be at any significant risk.

          The directors however have a fiduciary duty to act in the interests of all shareholders, so going through the motions of considering a replacement ticks that box.