Epic Games v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers just ruled that, effective immediately, Apple is no longer allowed to collect fees on purchases made outside apps and blocks the company from restricting how developers can point users to where they can make purchases outside of apps.

. .

The judge also referred the case to the US attorney to review it for possible criminal contempt proceedings.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Tbh for a broken clock Sweeney shows the right time remarkably often. Can’t believe it, the bar for people like him is so low just being consistent is noteworthy lol

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        At least he never cosplayed team pleb tbh… Kinda doing his own “situation”

        Rest of them is one of “us” hard working mavrevk or some shite

        Still cunt tho

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Epic’s most redeeming quality is their willingness to take bigger companies to court for their trash policies. Now if only we could get the FTC to do their jobs so Epic wouldn’t have to…

  • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sweeney is also offering a “peace proposal” from Epic: “If Apple extends the court’s friction-free, Apple-tax-free framework worldwide, we’ll return Fortnite to the App Store worldwide and drop current and future litigation on the topic.”

    Pretty sure this has a 0% chance of working.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Rogers also says that Apple “willfully” chose not to comply with her previous injunction from her original 2021 ruling

    Why did it take them 4 years to enforce their own ruling?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Because the legal system is low moving even when major corporations aren’t trying to delay things and you can bet that Apple did everything they could to slow down enforcement. I’m surprised it only took 4 years.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Apple has $50B+ in literal cash. Epic’s entire revenue is under $7B/yr. Apple can afford to run Epic for decades on their cash reserves alone without impacting their bottom line.

      That’s why it took 4 years. I’m surprised Apple didn’t bury them.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t understand what that has to do with anything? It doesn’t cost either of them anything to enforce a ruling the court already made.