ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agoAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1885arrow-down118
arrow-up1867arrow-down1imageAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-26 days agoThat’s intentional. But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days agoTechnically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.
That’s intentional.
But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
Technically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.