• Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    GOP are better on Ukraine than the Democrats are, at least admitting the reality of the situation - that it was a proxy war they lost and they now need to extract themselves from it. Democrats are still in kookoo land on this subject.

    So if we’re calling both American ruling parties support for a genocidal ethnostate a wash, since they both do it equally, and arbitrarily picking other topics instead why don’t we use this criteria to argue the GOP are the “harm reduction” candidates since they won’t zealously lead us into WW3 and nuclear war?

    (I am not advocating voting for the GOP, just using an example to show you the flaw in your logic here)

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Mostly cause I support Ukraine and gop give up stance is ridiculous and apeasrment is bs. I hope if Canada invades Vermont gop just gives up.

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If you support Ukraine you should support their immediate surrender because they have lost and you dragging this out is just killing thousands of them for no reason and making their situation worse by the day.

        Your entire logic is “lesser of 2 evils” right?

        The two choices with Ukraine is to keep pushing military support until their country collapses and hundreds of thousands more soldiers die, or surrender and take a deal where they disarm and stay neutral.

        Guess which one is the “lesser evil”?