yes, at first and for a long time while the perceived need for machismo gradually fades away.
I don’t think it necessarily would fade away in those circumstances. You can have gay patriarchy. It’d be different than hetero patriarchy, but patriarchy is patriarchy.
Yes, I guess the economic reasons for patriarchy would still be there. Splitting productive wage labor from unpaid labor that reproduces the ability to work would still be helpful to capital.
I don’t think it necessarily would fade away in those circumstances. You can have gay patriarchy. It’d be different than hetero patriarchy, but patriarchy is patriarchy.
very true, but i’m betting that it’s not going to take the same toxic form that it has now.
Yes, I guess the economic reasons for patriarchy would still be there. Splitting productive wage labor from unpaid labor that reproduces the ability to work would still be helpful to capital.