DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoFreud rulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1401arrow-down14
arrow-up1397arrow-down1imageFreud rulesh.itjust.worksDeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareweeeeum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoDo we give his theories any credence at all? Seems like his theories are always mocked and ridiculed, at least in the context I see them in
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoAccording to a south american friend studying psychology, both Freud and Jung are still part of the standard curriculum there, and mostly uncritically
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoLacan and Žižek seem to. At least Žižek mostly just seems to use it to interpret and deconstruct cinema.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoPeople talk about the subconscious as if it’s a real thing rather than his invented theory to explain away the fact that the vast majority of people quite firmly believe that they don’t want to have sex with their parents.
Do we give his theories any credence at all? Seems like his theories are always mocked and ridiculed, at least in the context I see them in
According to a south american friend studying psychology, both Freud and Jung are still part of the standard curriculum there, and mostly uncritically
Lacan and Žižek seem to.
At least Žižek mostly just seems to use it to interpret and deconstruct cinema.
People talk about the subconscious as if it’s a real thing rather than his invented theory to explain away the fact that the vast majority of people quite firmly believe that they don’t want to have sex with their parents.