SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 months agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1333arrow-down13
arrow-up1330arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareZ3k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 months agoBeyond? Wouldn’t that mean it’s rising again
minus-squarelatenightnoir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months ago“Below,” not “beyond” :P Which, to my mind, means it would become submolecular, then absolutely negligible - basically non-existent!
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoIt is a location, going further will not change the size.
minus-squarelatenightnoir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoAnd artistic license is a valid concept :P Unless you’re actually expecting an abstract notion such as stock price to physically travel to the Earth’s core.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoSure, you can do that. But I would never understand anything like that from such a sentence.
Beyond? Wouldn’t that mean it’s rising again
“Below,” not “beyond” :P Which, to my mind, means it would become submolecular, then absolutely negligible - basically non-existent!
It is a location, going further will not change the size.
And artistic license is a valid concept :P Unless you’re actually expecting an abstract notion such as stock price to physically travel to the Earth’s core.
Sure, you can do that. But I would never understand anything like that from such a sentence.