OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down13
arrow-up1241arrow-down1imageMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deOpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down4·2 months agoI find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoIt’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable. But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing. 👀
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·2 months agoYou clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoi find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo
I find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
It’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable.
But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing.
👀
I need the rest for science
You clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.
deleted by creator
i find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo