Because "In Denmark, it is common for trees, wooden fences and even plastic sheets to act as windbreaks for crops. “We thought, if we are going to do this, why not make these wind shelters produce electricity?” says Victoria.
In other words, the solar panels aren’t taking away any crop space that wasn’t already taken for windbreaks.
If you’re used to a giant field of wheat with no protection from wind, it’s a different equation. (With climate change, possibly a Dust Bowl waiting to happen, but that’s another story.)
I don’t think the project was aimed at Iowa or Kansas. For one thing, they’re tornado country. You’d need to be able to retract the panels into the ground like missile silos or a 007-villain’s evil lair.
Not all crops need 100% sun exposure in 100% of their growing regions.
Many crops do better with a little bit of well placed shading to help keep temperatures/sun damage down.
The way these panels are oriented they may also reduce wind flow over the crops which can improve water retention (but may lead to other problems if crops are over-irrigated).
Mathematically it’s entirely possible to have better crop yield than a vast expanse of monocrops devoid of shelter.
@droporain you have made it very clear that its not an idea you would apply and your only contribution to the conversation has been lol look omg shitty idea
ok we get you, you dont see any utility
you dont add anything and only rebate what the rest are saying
what makes you think i have not read it and have found a case use where it helps me¿?
what would be your solution¿? how would you plant crops¿?
enlighten us please add something to the conversation
Plants don’t necessarily need as much sunlight as they get. More tends to be wasted and drys them out (thus wasting water). Growing in shade is actually better for many types of plants.
Dude, this has had a lot of scientific research behind it already. Perhaps you could read some of it rather than doing the thing you’re ranting against?
Removed by mod
Oh. Sorry. I thought it was good to be able to both have farming land and solar power. Sorry for missing the mark.
Removed by mod
If only there was a very concise article to explain their test and control groups. I guess looking at the picture is good enough
Because "In Denmark, it is common for trees, wooden fences and even plastic sheets to act as windbreaks for crops. “We thought, if we are going to do this, why not make these wind shelters produce electricity?” says Victoria.
In other words, the solar panels aren’t taking away any crop space that wasn’t already taken for windbreaks.
If you’re used to a giant field of wheat with no protection from wind, it’s a different equation. (With climate change, possibly a Dust Bowl waiting to happen, but that’s another story.)
Removed by mod
I don’t think the project was aimed at Iowa or Kansas. For one thing, they’re tornado country. You’d need to be able to retract the panels into the ground like missile silos or a 007-villain’s evil lair.
Removed by mod
Not all crops need 100% sun exposure in 100% of their growing regions.
Many crops do better with a little bit of well placed shading to help keep temperatures/sun damage down.
The way these panels are oriented they may also reduce wind flow over the crops which can improve water retention (but may lead to other problems if crops are over-irrigated).
Mathematically it’s entirely possible to have better crop yield than a vast expanse of monocrops devoid of shelter.
Removed by mod
From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics#Advantages
Increased crop yield has been shown for a number of crops:
Basil[46] Broccoli[47] Celery[48] Chiltepin peppers[49] Corn[50]/maize[51] Lettuce[52][53] Pasture grass[54] Potatoes[55] Spinach[46] Tomatoes[49] Wheat[56]
Sheep grazing around solar panels in Australia produce a higher volume of wool, at better quality.[38]
Removed by mod
Yes? Everything ever has advantages and disadvantages. Thanks for catching up.
Removed by mod
@droporain @RvTV95XBeo
Increased crop yield has been shown for a number of crops:
Basil[46]
Broccoli[47]
Celery[48]
Chiltepin peppers[49]
Corn[50]/maize[51]
Lettuce[52][53]
Pasture grass[54]
Potatoes[55]
Spinach[46]
Tomatoes[49]
Wheat[56]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics
Removed by mod
@droporain you have made it very clear that its not an idea you would apply and your only contribution to the conversation has been lol look omg shitty idea
ok we get you, you dont see any utility
you dont add anything and only rebate what the rest are saying
what makes you think i have not read it and have found a case use where it helps me¿?
what would be your solution¿? how would you plant crops¿?
enlighten us please add something to the conversation
Removed by mod
Plants don’t necessarily need as much sunlight as they get. More tends to be wasted and drys them out (thus wasting water). Growing in shade is actually better for many types of plants.
Removed by mod
Dude, this has had a lot of scientific research behind it already. Perhaps you could read some of it rather than doing the thing you’re ranting against?
https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northeast/topic/agrivoltaics-coming-soon-farm-near-you
https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/agrivoltaics-solar-and-agriculture-co-location
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQGLyxyYJio