geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoCultural enrichmentlemmy.mlimagemessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up1618arrow-down150
arrow-up1568arrow-down1imageCultural enrichmentlemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square181fedilink
minus-squareMalek061@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·4 months agoTwo years after Xinjiang findings, UN reports ‘limited access to information’, ‘reprisals’ against activists | ISHR https://search.app/rTPVgDbwvYQ9ozAEA China is refusing to allow an investigation. That’s a presumption of guilt.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-24 months agoI never heard of the ISHR. They seem to be cagey about their funding sources 🤔 The actual UN OHCHR report is a one-pager that provides no detail or evidence to back up its mention of “limited access” and “fear of reprisals”: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/2024/08/china-update-work-un-human-rights-office Weak tea. ETA: Looking deeper, the funding seems to mostly come from NATO & NATO “partner” governments and the Ford Foundation.
Two years after Xinjiang findings, UN reports ‘limited access to information’, ‘reprisals’ against activists | ISHR https://search.app/rTPVgDbwvYQ9ozAEA
China is refusing to allow an investigation. That’s a presumption of guilt.
I never heard of the ISHR. They seem to be cagey about their funding sources 🤔
The actual UN OHCHR report is a one-pager that provides no detail or evidence to back up its mention of “limited access” and “fear of reprisals”: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/2024/08/china-update-work-un-human-rights-office
Weak tea.
ETA: Looking deeper, the funding seems to mostly come from NATO & NATO “partner” governments and the Ford Foundation.