These dipshits can’t see two inches in front of their fuckin noses. They can’t help but think without nuance. Why does the revolutionary political act of assassination have to be gendered?
Because they’re sexist, that’s why. They’d call these woman “unfeminine” for “acting like a man.” They believe violence and power are inherently, fundamentally masculine features.
It’s all part of the process of manufacturing consent. These people are paid propagandists working overtime to dilute and disrupt the revolutionary ideas that the ceo shooter had when he pulled the trigger. The rich are scared; this is literally what keeps them up at night.
These dipshits can’t see two inches in front of their fuckin noses. They can’t help but think without nuance. Why does the revolutionary political act of assassination have to be gendered?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Sau_Ying
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Zasulich
Revolution is not male. It’s not anything but an attempt to break the bonds of oppression. Many women have taken part.
Because they’re sexist, that’s why. They’d call these woman “unfeminine” for “acting like a man.” They believe violence and power are inherently, fundamentally masculine features.
It’s all part of the process of manufacturing consent. These people are paid propagandists working overtime to dilute and disrupt the revolutionary ideas that the ceo shooter had when he pulled the trigger. The rich are scared; this is literally what keeps them up at night.
Don’t lament. Organize.
Join a union.
I mean, sure that’s a great idea too. But we’re way beyond just unionizing to fix this issue.