To be fair, they didn’t say they were okay with it 🤷‍♂️

You are being very weird

I’m totally in favour of solving multiple problems at once.

Personally, I do not view this as a problem. My issue is with the EU Parliament wasting time with this in place of anything that I perceive as an actual problem.

If you think that calling veggie burgers “burgers” is a problem worth their time and effort, more power to you 👍

Haha yeah awesome real problems getting solved by serious politicians here, guys! If you can actually get your hands on any real meat without paying an arm and a leg for it what the actual fuck are we doing here lads what the fuck are these fucking politicians doing???

The world is on fire, the economy is in the shitter globally, there are multiple ongoing genocides, facism is on the rise again, and we’re wiggling our dicks around talking about whether you can call veggie burgers “burgers”? Are you serious? WHO CARES???

Is this bring your kid to work day and they let the kids do a vote for a change instead as a treat? Is this a joke?? What motherfucker is getting into politics to make sure “hey those damn vegans better not call anything a burger”.

These poncy little briefcase-botherers need a hobby or something because this is absolutely the biggest case of dicking around on the job I’ve ever heard of. Ridiculous. Stupid. A joke. Pathetic. Childish. Vapid. Can we get some adults in the EU Parliament please?

I think ‘master’ is fine for the master branch. It’s a master copy of the codebase.

I think ‘main’ is fine for the main branch. It’s the main branch of the repo.

I use ‘main’ at work cos that’s what my git client defaults to. I use ‘master’ at home because that’s what my git client defaults to. 🤷‍♂️

Being slightly wrong in a translation is bad, for sure, but doesn’t (often) invent new facts. I still would not trust it for a legal document, personally.

I did actually originally ask what your point was in the comment I wrote, but I couldn’t phrase it in a way that didn’t feel hostile - which I hope I’m not coming across as. I just couldn’t quite grasp the point you were trying to make, and I think it’s because we disagree on a fundamental level here.

Yes if they’re signing a contract, absolutely get a lawyer if you don’t understand what you’re signing, but occasionally you just need to look up a law or accept a eula, and it would be nice to be able to have some help reading it, even if it’s from an imperfect tool.

I agree with the first part about signing a contract, but totally disagree with the second. If I need to look up a law, or anything at all, I would never run it through a machine that regularly invents “facts” from whole cloth, or misinterprets, while agreeing and confidently backing any implications I give it. LLMs are inherently untrustworthy, in my opinion, partly because they’re programmed to be “yes-men” who engage the user constantly in order to sell them a service, and partly because they don’t “know” anything - they just essentially scrape the web and then uncritically mash whatever they find together and return it in convincing natural language.

I think they are dangerous to engage with at any level.

The reason you ask a lawyer and not an LLM if you can’t understand the original document is because LLMs regularly misinterpret and hallucinate, and you might have no way to verify that what it says is true.

The LLM doesn’t know things. It isn’t “the key” or “the answer”. I don’t think this user is talking about translating a legal document from another actual language or anything.

Hey how’d you get your hands on my code

My boss will regularly send random, unrelated, unrequested AI videos into the general slack channel, and literally everybody else in the room loves them. It’s fucking weird, it feels like being the only grown-up in a nursery sometimes 😂

deleted by creator

What do you mean?

This isn’t harmless though, and I’d argue it’s still really harmful. Imagine becoming convinced a loved one is trapped inside ChatGPT. We’ve already got plenty of reports of chatbot induced psychosis, and a few suicides.

Honestly, may as well be. I wish there was some way to have an internet that wasn’t bots, or subject to advertising and marketing creeps, but that’s just not gonna happen outside of like… I don’t know. I don’t even know where the infrastructure would begin for humans to separate themselves online and build an actual community. It would be tough. It’s a shame, really. This could have been so good.

If it’s not supposed to be a replacement for a human being then what the actual fuck is it supposed to be?

My boss did this same exact shit. ‘oh, no no, we won’t be relying on AI to develop our websites! No no, not at all! You just have to use it to write the code for you! It’s not a replacement for a developer, it’s just a tool!’

AI freaks are some of the weirdest, dumbest, most maliciously anti-human people on Earth.

It’s ‘case in point’, by the way.

Maybe the situation here is different, but in the video game industry when boycotts happen due to scummy business practices and then get instantly forgiven, those companies in question usually figure out a new way to implement those scummy practices that flies under the radar. Or they just do it again, at a better time.

I can’t help but feel Disney will now work out a new way to appease the fascist regime, but without openly annoying supporters like this. Maybe those private “thoughtful conversations” they had with Kimmel contained some directives. Maybe we’ll get a more neutered show now. Appeasing the regime is the problem really.

Removed by mod

And then gained the majority of them back immediately after unsuspending him I would guess? As consumers, we are far far far too quick to forgive.