Direct link: https://idata.over-blog.com/0/01/53/72/jeux-32-64bits/zelda-ocarina-fee.jpg

“We have Great Fairy at home”

Great Fairy at home:

Not reading all of that but

Gynephilia = attraction to female bodies

Androphilia = attraction to male bodies

It’s quite the opposite. I’m realising more and more as I age, how important it is to be able to cooperate and be nice to others both on individual and societal levels.

Granted, some environments won’t allow for altruism without harming you (for instance, toxic workplaces where unselfishness will be taken advantage of). If I was in an environment like that I wouldn’t change my core values – I’d switch environments.

Can you play DOOM on the light switch?

“I can: Accomplish” kind of sums it up though

You know when you microwave frozen soup and there is still a lump of ice in the middle even though the sides are boiling? This new cold war thing is starting to feel like that

“Bad” graphics smh

It’s posted on their own site:

https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/aktuellt/2025/02/forsvarsmakten-anvander-appen-signal-for-oppen-kommunikation-med-mobiltelefoner/

Meanwhile, the Swedish Armed Forces recently decided to use Signal for secure communication: https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/aktuellt/2025/02/forsvarsmakten-anvander-appen-signal-for-oppen-kommunikation-med-mobiltelefoner/

Sounds like a Pokémon

Have you heard of Argentine ants?

Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_ant

Radio lab episode: https://radiolab.org/podcast/argentine-invasion

Yes. Imagine how filthy your teeth would be if you just chewed the toothpaste, and skipped the mechanical cleaning of brushing/flossing.

Source?

Reminds me of the zoo level in Kye! That was such a great game.

One big favourite is the fan translation of Mother 3 for GBA.

Sure, it’s truism. I just felt like I had to make myself super clear since you kept using car and knife safety as examples.

Your original comment spoke about safety mechanisms in gun construction, not about how carrying, in itself, makes others more unsafe, which is my point here. Along the way you’ve written things I thoroughly don’t agree with, like

A trained person carrying a gun is safer than not.

Take this video of unarmed policemen trained in de-escalation, for instance. Would this situation have been handled more safely if it was handled by gun-trained, armed policemen?

Yes but the reason I don’t agree with you is that knives, and cars for that matter, serve different purposes:

• A knife that is safe for the chef will be safe for his guest if operated correctly
• A guillotine that is safe for the executioner will not be safe for his victim if operated correctly
• A car that is safe for the driver will be safe for the pedestrian if operated correctly
• A gun that is safe for the shooter will not be safe for the target if operated correctly

Do you not see the difference here?

Well. Since the tools are lethal, and countries implementing the death penalty always end up killing innocent people, and more guns = more gun violence and accidents, it’s obvious to me that these tools are not safe. To me, gun safety is as applicable to the real world as the perfectly straight line in mathematics, or the perfectly rational thinker in logics…

I’m fascinated by the emphasis on protection in your (and Americans’ in general) definition of safety. In Europe, “safe” simply means “not dangerous”. From your “wildly widely (edit: typo) understood” definition, I get the feeling that you view danger as unavoidable. Would you mind sharing your thoughts on what safety would mean to you and your community, if there was no danger to protect from? Would you still carry a gun for protection if all strangers were harmless? Have you ever visited a country where no one, not even law enforcement, carries lethal weapons? Etc.

I’m sorry; I was being sarcastic. Thank you for the reply though.

I would like to add that since everybody makes mistakes, no one can (statistically) handle a gun 100% safely 100% of the time. E.g. a carried gun is never completely safe from theft. So no carrier is “safe”, therefore no gun is “safe”. Personally I would not use that word when referring to objects designed to do harm. I don’t think a modern car is a good analogy. A better one would be “modern guillotines are incredibly safe”.