Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square370fedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down112
arrow-up1379arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square370fedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·22 hours agoWater can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoI would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.
Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
I would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.