• Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    1000039036

    Seems you added a word to the definition that just so happens to be the one word your entire argument rests on.

      • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This is the full definition of that website:

        wet (comparative wetter, superlative wettest)

        1. Made up of liquid or moisture, usually (but not always) water.

        Synonym: wetting

        Water is wet.

        Pfft! 'Tis clearly biased propaganda to perpetuate the water is wet agenda and I will not tolerate it!

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          At the atomic level it is very different that’s why service tension is a thing.

          Water forms hydrogen bonds with other water molecules but it won’t form hydrogen bonds with oxygen (under normal temperatures) molecules. So under the surface water is bonded to other water on all sides. But on the surface it’s only bonded to water below it under the sides, above it is unbonded. When water makes something wet it doesn’t bond to that thing so they’re still separate elements, but the surface of the water is making a barrier between itself and the bonded water. Resulting in different properties.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I would say this still works.

      1000005055

      1000005057

      Assuming we are not compressing it, you cannot fit more water into water. Therefore, water is saturated with itself. Therefore, it is soaked. Therefore, it is wet.

      • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.

        • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.