The web UI actually looks decent now.

  • Matty_r@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    A rebrand, with some new features, a new app etc etc, with not a single mention of adding AI in everything. Amazing.

  • BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.infoOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    They also have regular one time password two factor authentication (6 digit code every 30s) for a while now, in case you tried them while it was still the weird “PIN + OTP” thing

  • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    For me personally there is not much use in these changes. I only access it through Thunderbird or K9-Mail. I would prefer if they would ease the creation of temporary Mails instead of hiding it in the settings.

    Also I need to try out the New 2FA Integration instead of the strange pin+otp login method.

    • kayazere@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you have a custom domain with your account, you can setup a catch all alias, then any email address at your domain will arrive in your inbox.

      • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That sounds interesting. I never thought about using it that way. I will give it a try. Thanks for the hint!

    • BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.infoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would prefer if they would ease the creation of temporary Mails instead of hiding it in the settings. Yeah me too. I wish they’d integrate with Bitwarden’s e-mail address generator. If you e.g. use anonaddy you just paste a anonaddy apikey into Bitwarden and it creates e-mail aliases in anonaddy for you.

      Though it would be nice to just use the e-mail alias service from your existing e-mail provider (as you describe with mailbox) rather than buying another 3rd party service.

      • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep, I also prefer sticking to my email-provider providing me this kind of service instead of a 3rd party one.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    If only they would fix the DMARC issue. That one is really bad. Basically the most problematic issue they have atm.

  • chaitae3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    How is “undo send” supposed to work? I would never trust a mail server that honours a request to delete a mail from a user’s inbox.

    Edit: Just read that it means “stop it from being sent”. I don’t know in how many milliseconds you’d have to click that button, but that’s fine.

    • guynamedzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Gmail has an undo send feature, in reality, every email you send through Gmail is delayed by something like thirty seconds, and if you click undo send within that time, it simply won’t send the email

    • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I am using it since like 5 years (?) and had no major problems with it. Only downsides where the ugly implementation of 2FA at the beginning and the bad support for e-mail encryption/signing.

        • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          For me the overall handling was bad in their frontend if you just wanted to use it for specific mails. If you wanted to encrypt your whole inbox it was working just fine. But then you had no possibility to decrypt the mails in their frontend and relied on using 3rd party browser extensions.

          And you had no way to bind the public key to your account and make it accessible for everyone publicly.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            And you had no way to bind the public key to your account and make it accessible for everyone publicly.

            What do you mean by this?

            • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              For example I would expect them to have a keyserver hosting the public Keys of their customers and making sure that only the real customer is able to update his public Key. So nobody else can publish a public key for a given E-Mail without being the owner of the E-Mail.

              An ideal implementation could be Web Key Directory (short WKD).

              I did a quick search if mailbox.org supports WKD. It looks like mailbox.org Guard somehow supports it, but I never tried it. So maybe it is worth having a look at that.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can’t even register. “an error occurred while creating the account. Please try again later” oof

  • Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is really great! While i have been a happy Migadu user for a while im not fan of the new Swizz laws being passed there. Mailbox is looking better than ever!